Blog Logo

Category:  Kids

Wednesday, November 09, 2011

MMM: Why Graphic Images on Cigarettes Are a Bad Idea


No Medical Advice

The government mandated, among other labeling changes, the addition of graphic color images on cigarette packs, with the intention of discouraging kids and teens from smoking. These images were to include a dead body, cancerous tissue, and a man exhaling smoke through a hole in his throat.

Don't get me wrong - I'm all for anything that keeps cigarettes out of kids' hands, and lungs. I just don't, personally, think this is the best idea. In fact, beyond the First Amendment rights imfringements on tobacco companies, this may - seriously - be the worst idea yet.

Let me explain:   [Continue Reading ...]

Graphic Cigarette Packs
Credit: Reuters/U.S. Food and Drug Administration/Handout

Kids today aren't put off by graphic images. Between TV, movies and games, they are bombarded with graphic scenes at every turn. So very many of them are, simply, numb to them.

Worse than that, I know a lot of kids / teens that would find the images (above) 'cool' and might actually go out of there way to get their hands on the cigarette packs just to shock and impress their friends. The exact opposite goal of this mandated change.

Yes, I know that this doesn't apply to all kids. But, in my opinion, the kids who would be put off by the pictures are not going to be buying cigarettes or taking up smoking to begin with. So, again, this campaign is not effectively reaching at-risk kids and teens.

Of course, for now, it's all a mute point as a judge has granted a temporary injunction - in favor of tobacco companies. What do you think? Is it possible for companies and government to keep cigarettes out of kids' hands?

Or is that a job for Mom and Dad?


I am not a medical / healthcare professional. I simply offer my opinion of what I read in the news and on the 'Net. Nothing written here is intended to be medical advice or to substitute for consultation with a healthcare professional.

Always consult your physician about any health conditions or concerns.

 



Sunday, October 23, 2011

Looney Tunes for Reading


One battle we had with the boys, when they came to live with us, was reading. Neither of them were good at it, so they simply avoiding reading whenever possible.

I truly wish we'd known about Looney Tunes ClickN READ Phonics in those days. It could have made such a huge difference for Michael. We had so much trouble finding books that interested him, but were within his reading level - about 1st grade at the age of 13.

Life is so incredibly difficult for kids and teens, and adults, who don't read well. It simply snowballs into problems in so many other areas. How do you get a job, when you can't complete an application?

How do you rent an apartment, buy a car -- do anything -- when you can't read and write well enough to understand the paperwork?

If you have a child who is just learning to read, or perhaps is falling behind in school, this may be just the help you - and they - need.




Posted in: Education, Kids   Comments

Saturday, October 22, 2011

Crocheting for Baby ~ October Only


Don't Forget ~ Our Newest additions

For October, our all-new baby items are only available to our blog readers and visitors to JMark Afghans' Store. So, please, read on and let us know what you think.   [Continue Reading ...]


Newborn Hat, Sweater, & Shoes

Newborn Hat, Sweater, & Shoes

This newborn set consists of a cloche-style (brimless) hat, sleeveless sweater, and lace-up bootie shoes.

Crocheted in 3-ply baby yarn, this set is soft, comfy for baby, and easy on and off. Designed for little girls, there is a cute little flower on the hat with a simple bow in the center.

Newborn Sweater - Yellow

The main color makes up the bodice, trim, and ties on the sweater, as well as the upper on the shoes. We've crocheted the soles and ties of the shoes in the accent color - and just love the look!


Because not everyone wants / likes more than one color, we offer the option of ordering the set in a single color. It's just as lovely. And, as always, shipping is included in the price.


 

Hats, Mittens, and Booties

These sweet, warm baby hats, mittens, and booties simply must be seen to be believed. They are so cute, no matter what color.

Newborn Hat, Mittens, & Booties
Newborn Hat, Mittens, & Booties

This newborn set consists of a cloche-style (brimless) hat, mittens, and booties. Crocheted in 3-ply baby yarn, this set is soft, comfy, and stretches just enough to fit all newborns. All ties are done in white.

The booties and mittens are appropriate for boys, girls, and when you don't know yet. Simply pick the right colors for your baby / grandbaby, and we'll take it from there.

The flower is optional, as you can see. For boys, simply check 'No' and we'll leave it off.

With winter on it's way, it's a good time to think about keeping warm. And, because these items are small, they ship within 3 days of your order - for Free.


We are so excited about these new items. Hopefully, you will be, too. Please let us know what you think.

 



Wednesday, October 19, 2011

Outdoor Furniture and Play Areas


Adirondack Rocker

I know that I don't have a yard, or even a patio - yet. But, I just can't resist Adirondack chairs. The style is so smooth and simple. They go anywhere.

What I didn't realize is that they can also be quite elegant. Just look at this gorgeous rocker. The detailed design on the back and front of the seat is - to my mind - just incredible.

But, you know me; I couldn't stop there. Once I found the site, I just kept 'shopping'.   [Continue Reading ...]

Wooden Park Bench

While the park benches I found are (probably) designed for public spaces, I don't see any reason they couldn't work on the back patio. Or even in a sun room or screened-in porch.

I can see a pad, like for a chaise, on the seat. Add a couple of tables and simple lamps, and ... ta da! A lovely spot to lounge with a good book.

Square Picnic Table

Picnic tables are another personal weakness. Sitting outside on a warm evening with burgers, dogs, and a pitcher of tea? Perfect.

I like the small-ish square units best. Seating four or more people, with the benches attached, they fit nicely in smaller spaces where long, rectangular tables just wouldn't go. And, seriously, so cute!

A bright cloth and some colorful tableware are all it needs.

Backyard Play Systems

Even though my granddaughter is only 17 months old and lives in Chicago, playground equipment just speaks to a grandparent.

The options are almost endless, but this one grabbed me. The adorable details got me started. Then, my inner child went "Ooooh!" and I was lost. Swings, bumpy slide, climbing wall - it's all here, just waiting for me to turn 4 again and climb on.

All I can say is: "Just wait until I get a yard!" (And hit the lottery, cuz there's a lot of shopping to be done here.)

 



Posted in: Fun_Stuff, Home, Kids   Comments

Saturday, October 15, 2011

Baby Shower Teddies


16in. Pink Bath Baby Bear

I've been crocheting baby clothes lately, so finding Shari's baby shower collection seems pretty timely. Especially since two of the gifts I made recently were designed to be shower gifts.

Personally, I fell in love with this not-so-little shower bear.

It's two gifts in one - a cuddly 16-inch teddy bear and an adorable bath hoodie. Teddies are always great, but those hooded bath towels are a god-send for parents.

You've got a slippery little one, straight out of the bath. It's important to keep her warm and get her dry, as quickly and easily as possible. These towels will do that: slide the hood over his head, then wrap the long, wide towel around him.

Easy as that - your little teddy-baby is covered, warm, and dry.




Posted in: Great_Ideas, Kids, Shopping   Comments

Monday, October 03, 2011

The Dead Kid Detective Agency


The Dead Kid Detective Agency  

by Evan Munday
Published by ECW Press

The Dead Kids Detective Agency

October Schwartz is new in town and she's about to turn thirteen. She doesn't fit in and gets picked on, a lot. So, although she's friends with a couple of fellow misfits at school, October starts spending her time in the cemetery - conveniently located through the gate in their backyard.

Inspired by the atmosphere, she decides to fight the boredom by writing a scary book about a cool demon-pounding chick. Which means more time in the cemetery, for ambience. Well, her dad did say go outside, didn't he?   [Continue Reading ...]

What October doesn't know is that the cemetery is home to five kids, about her age, from different eras of the town. Those five ghosts are only allowed to come out once a year, for a few days until Halloween. They aren't happy to find out October isn't a ghost - but, eventually, the six manage to become friends.

When the French teacher dies in a mysterious accident at school, October decides to investigate - with the help of the five dead kids. Well, it makes sense, doesn't it? They can walk through walls and get into places that she can't. Of course, not all of them can read and write, so there are some problems along the way.

Before they know it the kids (including October's school friends, who don't know about the ghosts) are knee-deep in murder plots, car chases, and searching for clues. Will they find out the truth? Will they get caught? And what happens when the five dead kids have to go back at midnight on Halloween?

*****

This has to be one of the greatest young fiction titles I've read since I was a tween/teen. The characters drew me in and took me back several decades. I found myself hunched over the laptop, scrolling like a maniac, eager to keep up with the kids.

Although there's a lot of time in a cemetery and murder plots and evil doings, it's not a frightening story. It's an exciting, fun adventure. And certainly made me hope that there are going to be many more cases for the Dead Kid Detective Agency.

 

Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary electronic galley of this book from the publisher through NetGalley.com <http://www.netgalley.com/> professional readers program. I was not required to write a positive review. The opinions I have expressed are my own.

 



Posted in: Kids, Reading   Comments

Monday, June 13, 2011

MMM: Autism Testing Study


Autism Speaks Logo

An article in Reuter's Health caught my eye and my ire.

A group of researchers, reviewing literature on the subject, has determined that there is no solid evidence to support screening toddlers for Autism. The study, published today in Pediatrics*, questions whether conducting routine Autism screenings   is beneficial to families and to the community.

Once I took a deep breath, I realized that I needed more information than the short article provided and went looking for the actual study.   [Continue Reading ...]

Definitions

Stepping away from the article and into the study itself, there are some basic definitions that impact the understanding of this study.

It is important to note that there are differences between screening and clinical surveillance. With screening, apparently healthy people are targeted to help them make better-informed health care choices. ... Clinical surveillance, on the other hand, involves the targeted use of diagnostic tests and questionnaires to either rule out or rule in a diagnosis among people who have a relatively high probability of having that condition by virtue of having already been identified in some way.
In other words, arbitrarily screening all toddlers for autism vs. testing children whose parents and/or pediatrician have already noticed possible problems or delays in development, or who are at higher risk.

Testing

Another question in the study was the effectiveness of current testing methods.

Some tests are incredibly good at determining children who are not at risk, but frequently fail to diagnose those who are: Checklist for Autism Spectrum Disorders in Toddlers (CHAT). Even with modifications, M-CHAT, the test is unable to diagnose 15% of children with autism.

Other tests generate a number of false positives, in addition to false negatives: Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ). The SCQ, according to the study, suffers from 15% false positives (not identifying children who don't have autism) and 25% false negatives (not identifying children who do have autism).

For routine community-wide testing, the available testing options were deemed insufficient. And, as the accuracy of the results are questionable, the "potential burdens on families of receiving a misdiagnosis (either a false-positive or a false-negative) may be enormous, and there might be labeling effects that can be hard to remove."

Treatment

Along with the question of accurately assessing which children have autism, there is the question of severity and treatment.

There are varying (widely varying) differences in the abilities and disabilities of children with autism. This is not measles or whooping cough, where you either have it or you don't. Each child is unique and must be treated according to his/her needs. Therein lies the problem.

Unlike interventions for phenylketonuria or congenital thyroid disease, there is no strong evidence of the effectiveness of the various autism therapies currently provided. In addition, the availability of these therapies is limited (there are waitlists often as long as >1 year in many therapy centers), and the cost is often prohibitive.
Programs for children with autism are difficult to find, difficult to get in to, and expensive. Even something as simple as behavioral therapy for a higher-functioning autistic is, pardon the term, a crap-shoot. If a program or service exists, and has room for one more, the quality of the therapy may be so poor as to be more harm than good. (I know.)

Conclusions

Strictly from the standpoint of testing all children for Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASDs), it appears that this study of current literature makes a valid point. Lacking accurate testing and readily available treatment options, arbitrarily subjecting children and families to testing seems pointless.

Ongoing research is certainly needed to assess the effectiveness and acceptability of screening programs for ASDs. ... [B]ecause the implications of instituting a major program without sound research-based evidence are so enormous, we believe that the child health community has an important responsibility to undertake [such] clinical trials as a matter of priority. At this time we recommend careful surveillance and assessment of all preschoolers who present with impairments in their development of language, social function, or cognitive skills that result in activity limitations, but we believe that community screening of all preschoolers is premature.

I repeat: "We recommend careful surveillance and assessment of all preschoolers who present with impairments in their development of language, social function, or cognitive skills that result in activity limitations." No one should, for a moment, take this study to mean that children should never be tested and families should not demand all available support and assistance. That would simply undo all of the progress that has been made.

And that, my friends, would be a crime against our children.


* This link to the full [PDF] article in Pediatrics  is valid as of this posting. Journals frequently limit access to full articles and, subsequent to this writing, access may be removed.

 



Thursday, June 02, 2011

MMM: Testing for Fragile X Syndrome


Babies in Nursery
Photo: Reuters/Romeo Ranoco

Being beyond the fertile-Myrtle childbearing years, I don't often think about medical tests for newborns. An article I ran across on Reuters, however, made me stop and think. When is testing helpful and when is it simply too much information?

The article in question asked whether babies should be screened for untreatable diseases? My heavens, what a difficult question - and decision.   [Continue Reading ...]

A parental poll, cited in the article, was specifically asking about Fragile X Syndrome. An incurable genetic condition, FXS is caused by a change in the FMR1 gene which makes a protein that is required for proper growth of the brain. The mutation makes the gene produce little, or none, of this protein.

Symptoms include delayed motor skills (crawling and/or walking), hand clapping or biting, hyperactivity, mental retardation, speech and/or language delay, and avoidance of eye contact. Only about 1 in 4,000 boys and 1 in 6,000 girls develop Fragile X Syndrome.

Yes

There are those who want to know; who want to be prepared for possibilities. All possibilities.

As rare as the syndrome is, parents feel the need to know.

No

Some parents don't believe in testing infants unnecessarily. Others believe, as one mother put it, "Knowing can cause anxiety. The chances of it happening are very small; don't know how it will unfold. Not knowing will not make you treat your child a certain way."

Me (and You?)

Personally, I don't think I'd want to know. Being a chronic worrier, I'd drive myself and my child crazy looking for signs and symptoms that probably weren't there. And, heaven forbid, my child should develop FXS - would knowing sooner have any positive effect?

What about you? Would you want your child tested? Why or why not?

 



Monday, May 30, 2011

The 'G' is Silent, You Moron!


Words image

One of my personal shortcomings is correcting, sometimes rudely, other people's pronunciation. I know this about myself, and struggle with it. Yet I have always been persnickety; probably always will be.

To me, how a person speaks is an overt indication of intellect; if not education. One doesn't need a PhD to communicate well and having one certainly doesn't guarantee verbal skills. Taking the time to learn, making the effort, to speak well also speaks (pardon the pun) to character.   [Continue Reading ...]

Pronounce Definition
Source: Merriam-Webster

With that said, I have a serious bone to pick with the ads for a new movie: Gnomeo & Juliet . In English, the G in gnome is silent. Therefore, were it an actual word, Gnomeo   would be pronounced: [nō ·  · ōh].

Wait! Hold that "Well, duh!?" for a second.

Each time the commercial voiceovers mention this movie's title character, his name is pronounced with a hard G-sound: [Guh ·  ·  · ōh]. Even the animated gnomes have more sense.

Why does the ad matter?

If you are a parent, you understand how much children 'learn' from television. The bright colors and loud music grab their attention. Sheer repetition pounds those messages into their malleable brains.

You also know that your youngsters will, in short order, be begging to see: [Guh ·  ·  · ōh]. That it will take weeks to correct their speech, because Mom and Dad simply are not as riveting as dancing gnomes and happy music.

You'd think a Disney production would show a little more responsibility. Or maybe I'm just being persnickety again.

 



Tuesday, May 17, 2011

No Smokes for Teens ... Again


Kid Smoking
Source: Wikimedia Commons

Since I was a kid, about 40 years ago ... and yesterday, it's been against the law to sell cigarettes to minors. When we went into the gas station to buy smokes, we - and the guy behind the counter - knew we weren't supposed to have them. We (and he) did it anyway.

Over time, the authorities got a little more adamant about enforcing the no-smokes-for-kids laws. They instituted strict guidelines and training for employees of stores that sold tobacco products. No ID; no cigs.

Every few years, they get adamant again.   [Continue Reading ...]

The latest? Multi-state accord would reduce tobacco sales to minors. Just gotta shake my head and snort, derisively.

For decades, I've watched these big pushes to keep cigarettes out of the hands (and lungs) of minors. There are threats of random compliance checks, implementation of training programs, and 50-year-old customers getting carded. Been there, done that, got the t-shirt.

Smoking isn't cool; it isn't glamorous. Trust me on that one. After puffing away for more than 40 years, I have lines and wrinkles and crinkles that, I know, I wouldn't have without the smokes. Not to mention, I also know that I don't want to see my lungs.

But, I don't know what the answer is.

Kids who want to smoke are going to find a way to get cigarettes. That's a fact. They believe they're invincible, so health risks are not going to scare them. Another fact. And rules and regulations only have a limited, short-term impact. Final fact.

Sure, for a while, cigarette sales to teens slump. Then, everyone gets over it. Stores relax, clerks forget to check IDs, or some friendly adult shrugs and buys for kids. (I've seen 'em do it.)

Bottom line? 1.) It is, and nearly always has been, illegal to sell tobacco or alcohol to minors; 2.) There are not, and never will be, enough bodies to monitor every gas station, grocery store, and corner shop; 3.) Taxing cigarettes to death (pardon the pun) will just turn legal smokers into third-class citizens.

(Just had to throw that little rant in there. Sorry.)




Posted in: Business, Education, Health, Kids   Comments

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Wedding Albums


Lieblich in der Brauete Locken
Lieblich in der Brauete Locken

I haven't been to a lot of weddings in my life, but I could spend hours looking at wedding pictures.

There is a black and white shot of my daughter that just takes my breath away, every time I see it. And the picture of my son, at the altar, still makes me tear up.

When I wandered onto a site for Raleigh wedding photographers, I couldn't resist.

There's a quote, something about "All women (brides) are beautiful on their wedding day." Looking at all of these lovely images, there is no doubt of that. But, so many forget the groom.

If you want to see what love really looks like - watch the eyes of the groom, standing at the altar and looking at his bride.

Yup, that's beautiful, too.




Posted in: Fun_Stuff, Holiday, Kids   Comments

Wednesday, May 04, 2011

Perspective


Rest

Earlier, for reasons that shall remain my own, I was having a pity-party. Had out the hats and party favors - heading toward a serious poor-me hour or twelve. Was even considering baking a cake. Maybe canapés.

Then, I ran into my neighbor.

I knew that there were problems with a son and a girlfriend, and a baby. But problems were being handled; decisions were being made. Life was straightening itself out.

My pity-party was safe.

Then, he told me about his other child -- the one with the brain tumor. The one with the surgeries. The one regaining motor skills. A young person who was cheesed off because they had to cut his hair to do those surgeries. A father's joy over that simple aggravation.

Perspective.

Comes at you at the oddest times.




Posted in: Kids, Personal   Comments

Wednesday, April 20, 2011

Suing vs. Common Sense


Fast Food
Source: Wikimedia Commons

This, I must admit, makes me just a little crazy: the Happy Meal lawsuit. Filed by a San Francisco mother, the suit states that McDonald's Happy Meals violate consumer protection laws in California by advertising to kids.

Now, I don't have little kids screaming for the latest toys bundled into these meals, so maybe my viewpoint is a little different. But, what immediately occurs to me is a word I learned from my mother (and Nancy Reagan): "No!" Just tell kids, "No!"

Parents used to do that. A lot. And the world made a lot more sense.




Posted in: Food, Health, Kids   Comments

Tuesday, February 22, 2011

MMM: Antipsychotics and Pregnancy


No Medical Advice

The FDA announced, today, new labels for an entire class of medications: antipsychotics. The changes are primarily related to use during pregnancy; most specifically, during the third trimester.

Antipsychotics are used to treat Psychotic (characterized by delusions and hallucinations) Disorders, such as Schizophrenia. Some Mood Disorders with psychotic symptoms, such as Bipolar Disorder, are also treated with these medications.

To oversimplify, antipsychotics offer a host of potential, and potentially serious, side effects. The complications from untreated psychotic disorders are just as potentially serious. Therein lies the problem.   [Continue Reading ...]

Perhaps we should begin with a few definitions. Just what drugs are antipsychotics and what are the problems?

Antipsychotics

There are, primarily, two 'generations' of antipsychotics: typical (older) and atypical (newer).

Typical or First-Generation

Typical antipsychotics, discovered in the 1950s, weren't considered or called typical until after the development and clinical use of the newer medications. They work by keeping dopamine from attaching to receptors; by keeping dopamine levels down. The problem with this first generation was the almost certainty of extrapyramidal symptoms[1].

Drugs in this group include[2]:
  • Haldol (haloperidol)
  • Loxitane (loxapine)
  • Mellaril (thioridazine)
  • Moban (molindone)
  • Navane (thiothixene)
  • Orap (pimozide)
  • Prolixin (fluphenazine)
  • Stelazine (trifluoperazine)
  • Thorazine (chlorpromazine)
  • Trilafon (perphenazine)

Part of this group, Compazine (prochlorperazine) is a potent antipsychotic, but is only used as a short-term treatment for nausea and vertigo.

Atypical or Second-Generation

These drugs were developed in the 1990s, with the hopes that they would cause fewer extrapyramidal side effects[1]. They also work by blocking dopamine, but in different ways - not only from typical antipsychotics, but from each other.

Drugs in this group include[3]:
  • Clozaril, FazaClo (clozapine)
  • Fanapt (iloperidone)
  • Geodon (ziprasidone)
  • Invega (paliperidone)
  • Risperdal (risperidone)
  • Seroquel (quetiapine)
  • Zyprexa (olanzapine)

Also atypical, but developed more recently: Abilify (aripiprazole) and Saphris (asenapine). Symbyax, a combination of Prozac and Zyprexa (fluoxetine and olanzapine), is also included in this group.

FDA Drug Label Changes

Evidence

Based on a review of adverse events reports, the FDA has concluded that when mothers were treated in the third trimester with any antipsychotic, there was a risk of extrapyramidal signs[1] and/or withdrawal in their infants.

Symptoms included tremors, agitation, feeding disorders, drowsiness, abnormal changes in muscle tension, and respiratory distress. For many newborns, these effects subsided quickly; others required longer hospitalization.

Actions

Convinced that the risks apply to all antipsychotics, the FDA has modified the Pregnancy section of the labels for every drug in this class and notified healthcare professionals.

The new label offers more detailed information for psychiatrists, OB/GYNs, and their patients. It explains specific symptoms and that onset may be immediate or delayed. It reminds patients to not stop taking medications without consulting their physician and reminds physicians to closely monitor newborns.


  1. Extrapyramidal signs/side effects include sustained muscle contractions, causing muscle twisting and repetitive movements (dystonias); inability to sit still (akathisia); muscle rigidity and tremor (pseudoparkinsonism); involuntary repetitive movements, primarily of the mouth and face (tardive dyskinesia).
  2. About.com: Typical Antipsychotics and NIMH: Alphabetical List of Medications
  3. About.com: Atypical Antipsychotics and NIMH: Alphabetical List of Medications



Thursday, December 23, 2010

Santa Claus is Coming!


Santa and Sleigh

These days, NORAD spends Christmas Eve tracking Santa. But this is only the latest offering for all of us who believe in the magic.

Trust me, back in my youth (many thousands of years ago), we turned on the radio every Christmas Eve to learn how close Santa was to us. Once he got within a time zone or two, we were rushed off to bed.

Because everyone knows that Santa won't come to your house, if you're awake. And no child would dare to risk getting passed by on such an important night. We scurried off, without complaint, every year.

So, on Christmas-Eve-Eve ... He knows if you've been bad or good. So, be good for goodness sake!




Posted in: Fun_Stuff, Holiday, Kids   Comments

Monday, November 22, 2010

MMM: Cholera, Lead, Cold Meds, and Strokes


No Medical Advice

After taking the weekend off to turn another year older {sigh}, I've been checking out health news today. Can't say much of it is encouraging. (Maybe I'm reading the wrong sources - I wish.)

From UN peacekeepers bringing cholera to Haiti (possibly), to more novelty glasses with lead (definitely), to fewer ER visits for kids on cold meds (still too many) - it's a mixed bag, to say the least.

Of course, the study into stroke risk and divorce is destined to give parents nightmares for years and years to come. I hope that parents read these results carefully.   [Continue Reading ...]

 

Origins of Haiti Cholera

Before the recent outbreak, the CDC indicated cholera was unlikely to occur in Haiti because there was no cholera bacteria there. That bears repeating - No Cholera Bacteria in Haiti. In addition, most relief workers were from places where cholera was not a threat.

Over 3 days (October 9, 12, and 16), new troops deployed to a U.N. peacekeepers base, rumored to have an incredible stench and waste leaking into the nearby waterway. On October 20, Haiti radio announced that 19 people - living at the mouth of the Artibonite River - had died. Within 24 hours, cholera was confirmed as the cause of death.

That U.N. base? It's manned by troops from Nepal, where cholera outbreaks (yup, more than one) happened over the summer. And where 75% of the population, though contagious, show no symptoms of cholera.

That smell? The septic system:

"... when the AP visited on Oct. 27, a tank was clearly overflowing. The back of the base smelled like a toilet had exploded. Reeking, dark liquid flowed out of a broken pipe, toward the river, from next to what the soldiers said were latrines. U.N. military police were taking samples in clear jars with sky-blue U.N. lids, clearly horrified.

"At the shovel-dug waste pits across the street sat yellow-brown pools of feces where ducks and pigs swam in the overflow. The path to the river ran straight downhill."

The investigation continues.


Lead and Cadmium in Novelty Glasses

Once again, novelty glasses have been found to contain unsafe levels of lead and/or cadmium. Imported from China and sold at the Warner Brothers Studio store, one set of glasses were found to have a lead content of 16 to 30.2 percent. Designated as collectibles for adults (by the importer), therein lies the controversy.

Lead is not regulated in products for adults. The health risk is for children whose developing nervous systems are endangered by exposure to lead. However, these glasses are sold next to kids' t-shirts by Warner Brothers and touted as "a perfect way to serve cold drinks to your children or guests" by another online retailer.

Over at Coca-Cola, a set of novelty glasses that were designed to look like the manufacturer's soft drink cans have come under fire. The all-red Coke glasses leached cadmium from external decorations during testing by the Associated Press. Unlike lead, which is only regulated in products for children, cadmium exposure harms adults and children equally and is strictly limited in products, as well as the workplace.

Both companies have agreed to recall these new glasses.


Kids' ER Visits Down

It's been three years since the voluntary recall of cough and cold medications marketed to kids two and younger. Two years since withdrawal of the same medications for children aged four and under. Since then, the incidence of emergency room treatment for overdose and adverse reactions, in children under 2, has been cut in half; 2,790 before withdrawal compared to 1,248 after.

However, 75% of those treated were not given medication by parents. They 'got into it' while unsupervised; the same percentage of 'self-medication' seen pre-recall. Researchers say it is also possible that adverse events remained high because parents were giving their youngsters adult medications, as the versions for children are no longer available.

Please remember, mom and dad - 1.) Kids under 4 do not benefit from cough and cold medications; they do, however, suffer serious reactions. 2.) Don't give more than an age-appropriate dose of acetaminophen or ibuprofen for fever relief; and only for a high fever. 3.) Use a bulb syringe to remove mucus, saline nose drops to keep breathing passages open, and a vaporizer for congestion. 4.) Don't spare the fluids.

Never give adult medications - in any amount - to a child. Children do not process medications in the same way that adults process them; a sedative can make them 'hyper' and a stimulant, lethargic. Do not give aspirin or products containing aspirin to anyone under the age of 19, due to the risk of developing Reyes Syndrome.


Children of Divorce and Stroke Risk

These results were presented, today, at the 63rd Annual GSA Scientific Meeting.

Researchers reviewed information compiled in a 2005 survey performed by Statistics Canada. Data collected from 13,134 respondents in Manitoba and Saskatchewan, looked at how many were children of divorce and how many had experienced a stroke. Just over 10% had divorced parents and almost 2.0% had experienced a stroke, at some point in their lives. This, according to reports, indicates a 2.2 times greater risk of stroke for children of divorce.

My concerns: 1.) Stroke statistics were not included (in any story I could find) for participants whose parents were not divorced. 2.) These 'children' experienced their parents' divorce more than 50 years ago, when divorces were more rare, the shame was much greater, and trauma (perhaps) more severe. 3.) The findings have not been peer-reviewed or published.

No, children do not want their parents to get divorced - ever. It is a stressful situation for everyone. But it is not the same. Society does not shun the divorced; children are not tormented because they come from a 'broken' home.

There is no reason to believe that children of divorce in 2010 will be forever scarred and permanently stressed by the change in their family dynamic. At least, for those children, I certainly hope they aren't.





Wednesday, November 17, 2010

Amazon and Pedophiles


Portrait of Two Children

I have avoided weighing in on last week's Amazon vs. the Pedophiles brouhaha. Not because I support either side, believe me.

It was more a case of trying to wrap my feeble little brain around the idea that anyone, in their right mind, would believe that the world needed a Kindle ebook on abusing children. Or that mainstream society had the need to be able to purchase such an abomination on Amazon.

Twitter was all, well, a-twitter about it. Blog posts were popping up everywhere - arguing freedom of speech and screaming burn the book! A simple situation got very complicated.   [Continue Reading ...]

From where I sit, it all comes down to rights. And realistic expectations.

Authors

An author has every right to throw words on pages and pay to have them bound together in something resembling a book. That's what we like to call freedom of speech. Even if that speech is spurious and specious; claiming a value and honesty that doesn't stand up to closer inspection.

However, the expectation that anyone has the right to sell (or demand that others sell) those bound musings wherever and whenever they please is a different story. Especially, when one is musing about a subject that is, to put it mildly, polarizing. In other words, Christopher Hitchens or Edmund Cooper have every right to write what they choose; expecting a shelf at the local Christian book store is unrealistic.

Businesses

Amazon, or any business, has the legal right to choose what it will and will not offer for sale. "We reserve the right to refuse service ... " in action. That business also has a basic right to not support or give the appearance of supporting illegal activities. Or, they can throw up their hands and cry "We are not the morality police."

Businesses also know that they aren't going to please all of the people all of the time. If they take controversial positions or offer products that offend, they should expect people to complain or refuse to patronize their store. If they don't see that, they are deluding themselves.

Consumers

Then, there's the public. We, as consumers, have the right to purchase what we want, without prejudice or judgement. (I must add - within the limits of the law.) At the same time, we have the right to not be assaulted by personally objectionable material while trying to find a gift for our grandchild or spouse - from a mainstream business.

Therein lies the problem. What I consider objectionable may not coincide with my neighbor's opinion. And vice versa. To exaggerate, just a bit, that is how censorship begins - and, frequently, snowballs into out-of-control loss of basic rights. Expecting everyone to kowtow to my beliefs (or yours) is unrealistic.

Bottom Line

It is, to say the least, quite a balancing act.

Everyone has the right to live their life as they see fit, as long as they don't keep anyone else from exercising that exact same right. And as long as their lifestyle choices harm no one. No one has to eat broccoli, just because I like it; and you'll never get me to touch organ meat - never.

I can practice religious or atheistic beliefs; eat lots (and lots) of meat or nothing with a face; sing the praises of heavy metal or opera. I can be a technophile or a Luddite. Someone - I promise - will disagree with whatever position I take. Strongly and vocally, in all likelihood.

But, and this is where the balance tilts away from individual liberties, when a behavior or lifestyle or belief system (or personal choice) is, by its very nature, guaranteed to cause emotional or physical harm to another living being - it is not a protected freedom. No one has the right to rape another person or beat them or lock them in a basement for years on end. Or burn down their home or steal their car or intentionally cause them harm.

Nor, in my humble opinion, do they have the right to support or glorify such behavior. I would expect the same hue and cry over something titled "How to Beat Your Spouse, Discreetly" or "Arson For Fun and Profit: What To Do When the Neighbors Won't Move". But, hey that's just me: a non-religious, steak-loving, opera-neutral geek.




Posted in: Business, Kids, Media, News   Comments

Monday, November 15, 2010

MMM: Smoking Creates Criminals


Frankly, I had an immediate and very negative reaction to this headline: Heavy smoking in pregnancy linked to crime in offspring. Yes, part of it was because I'm a smoker.

But it also screamed of militant non-smoking clap-trap designed to terrify potential parents. Nonsense propagated by the anti-smoking lobby! (See? told you I had a strong reaction!)

Then I had to go and read the rest of the article. Ruined a perfectly good 'mad.'   [Continue Reading ...]

 
 

A little background: The study involved 4,000 adults, born to mothers who were enrolled between 1959 and 1966. Researchers collected data on the mothers' smoking habits during pregnancy. In 1999, when they were 33 through 40, a review was done of the offsprings' health and criminal records.

It was determined that when the mothers smoked at least a pack (20+ cigarettes) per day during pregnancy, their kids were 30% more likely to have a criminal record. Additionally, those same children were deemed more likely to repeat offend. Did I mention anti-smoking clap-trap?!

Well, maybe and maybe not. Even the researchers admit that they are unable to definitively prove causality - that smoking mothers give birth to future criminals more frequently than non-smoking mothers. At most, they suggest that heavy maternal smoking may present a risk factor. That I can accept.

On the other hand, which is what damaged my 'mad,' maternal smoking has been linked to smaller birth weights and other health issues in kids. Studies on animals suggest that nicotine has a negative effect on the developing brain, especially neurotransmitters. In turn, neurotransmitter malfunction is considered a factor in some disorders, including ADHD, bipolar disorder, and OCD.[1]

So, if we want to extrapolate:

  1. Maternal smoking exposes the fetus' developing brain to nicotine.
  2. Nicotine exposure has been shown to negatively impact developing neurotransmitters in the brain.
  3. Neurotransmitter problems may contribute to development of certain mental health conditions.
  4. Persons with some mental health disorders are more likely to engage in criminal behaviors.
  5. Therefore, ergo, and towit - maternal smoking contributes to criminal behaviors in their offspring.

It's a reasonable conclusion, given presumed truths. And, honestly, just one more reason to not smoke.


1. "Information About Mental Illness and the Brain." The Science of Mental Illness. National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health. Web. 15 November 2010. <http://science.education.nih.gov/supplements/nih5/mental/guide/info-mental-a.htm>




Friday, October 08, 2010

Feeling Crafty?!


Crayon Leaves

I'm not going to lie to you. I have absolutely no idea how I stumbled across this site - one of the joys of the Internet! Click here; go there ... ooooh, shiny! And you're off to the next cool thing you didn't know was out there.

Either way, if you're creative and crafty and looking for ideas? Check out A Pretty Cool Life - it's a lot of fun and will get you in the mood for making and doing. I know it worked for me!

I'm thinking, since my granddaughter's nursery is animal/zoo themed, that there are about a hundred ways to do little animals to hang in her window. Not to mention, the holidays that lend themselves to this easy idea. How many ideas does this inspire?! Tons!

Now I just need crayons, wax paper, and thread. And where did I put that iron?




Friday, October 01, 2010

Teens, Sex, and the Law


I've been reading a lot of horror stories recently, about the repercussions of intimate relations between under-age teens. The anecdotal evidence states that, following a nasty breakup or parental (or, less often, police) intervention, these teenagers are charged with and convicted of criminal conduct. Often sentenced to years in prison, they are forced to register as sex offenders and their lives are summarily destroyed.   [Continue Reading ...]

Anecdotal evidence makes for interesting reading. One of those everyone-knows-someone-who-knows-someone-who... situations that, like ghost stories around a campfire, are designed to scare the daylights out of the listener. It is, however, too often employed by people with preconceived notions and limited knowledge of the facts, to light a fire of indignation - in one direction or another. The truth lies somewhere between it never happens and You'll go to jail forever, if you even think about sex!

Overview

Unlike other types of rape where force is a key element under the law, all sexual activity with an individual who has not reached the age of consent (statutory rape) is legally deemed coercive. Therefore, consensual sexual relationships do not - legally - exist if one, or even both, of the partners are not old enough to give legal consent. The law believes that, before a certain age, an individual lacks the ability to understand the consequences of, and make an informed choice about, sharing their body with another person.

The laws, because heaven forbid anything should be consistent, vary widely from state to state. Not only do the age of consent[1], minimum age of the victim[2], age differential between victim and defendant[3], and minimum age of the defendant[4] differ between jurisdictions, state laws also vary in reporting requirements and responsibilities. Who is required to report what to whom, and when? Well ... it depends upon where you live.

The US Department of Health and Human Services contracted with The Lewin Group for a study that, among other data, compiled information about individual state laws and reporting requirements. (Links to the study results are included below.[5]) Rather than attempt to compile details for all 50 states, let's look at Arizona's laws - and what legal exposure sexually active teens (especially boys) might be facing in my state.

Arizona

Age Requirements

In Arizona, the numbers are as follows: 1.) a teenager can legally give consent at 18; 2.) cannot legally give consent before age 15; 3.) if 15, 16, or 17, s/he must be no more than 24 months younger than her/his partner and the older of the two must be in high school or under the age of 19; and 4.) there is no age at which the defendant is too young to prosecute for statutory rape.

What this says to me is that 19-year-old high school students in Arizona cannot be prosecuted if their partner is a student age 17 or older. For 18-year-olds, the threshold is age 16 or older; 17-year-olds, age 15-19; 16-year-olds, age 15-18; and 15-year-olds, age 15-17. Any non-student , over the age of 18, can be prosecuted for sexual activity with anyone under the age of 18. Arizona teens of any age, can be prosecuted for having a physical relationship with anyone under the age of 15, e.g., two 14-year-olds or a 16-year-old and a 13-year-old.

Seems pretty straightforward, doesn't it? Well, not so fast. As is typical, Arizona (not exactly alone in this one) muddies the waters more than a bit with who has to report, to whom they report, and what must be reported.

Who Must File Reports

We'll start with who is required to report to authorities, as that's actually pretty cut and dried: Mandated reporters include "Physical and mental health providers, social workers, peace officers, members of the clergy, parents and guardians of the victim, school personnel, or any other individual who has responsibility for the care or treatment of the victim." Any person "who reasonably believes that a minor is or has been a victim" of abuse may also contact authorities. Clergy, it should be noted, are not mandated by Arizona law to report suspected abuse - if they learn of the situation during a confidential communication or confession.

Who Must Receive Reports

To whom are these reports given? If it is suspected that the abuse is due to an "act or omission" by any person included on the Mandated Reporters list - e.g., parent, clergy, or physician harming or failing to protect a minor child - Child Protective Services and the police (peace officers) must be notified. For acts by non-mandated reporters, i.e., anyone not responsible for the care or welfare of the minor, only the police must be contacted.

What Must Be Reported

Now, the fun begins. According to the report[5] and Arizona law, Sexual Abuse[6], Molestation of a Child[7], and Sexual Conduct with a Minor[8] must be reported to CPS and/or the police. Except, and this is why I develop a migraine whenever I have to look at legal statutes, under ARS §13-3620 B "A report is not required under this section for conduct prescribed by sections 13-1404 and 13-1405 if the conduct involves only minors who are fourteen, fifteen, sixteen or seventeen years of age and there is nothing to indicate that the conduct is other than consensual." To which I can only say, "Huh?"

We just went through all of the age of consent, minimum ages, age differentials, and reporting requirements only to slam into - unless the reporter believes that the conduct is consensual. Okay, so Arizona teens between the ages of 14 and 17 can still have sexual relations with Arizona teens between the ages of 14 and 17 without repercussions? Well, from where I sit, it certainly sounds like it, doesn't it? With one possible snag.

Remember, one segment of the Mandated Reporters are parents and guardians. And although the statute states a report isn't 'required,' it doesn't say that it isn't possible. Not all parents are going to take kindly to their children being sexually active and frequently don't approve of the people their teens date.

My Arizona sons are all over 19 now, so we don't fall into that grey area anymore. They need to date 18-year-olds or face a world of troubles. And it doesn't much matter, to me anyway, if the girls are consenting or not. It just isn't worth the risk.

So, wherever you live, if you have sons or daughters, you might want to check this report and the laws in your state.



  1. Age of Consent:  "The age at which an individual can legally consent to sexual intercourse under any circumstances."
  2. Minimum Age of Victim:  "The age below which an individual cannot [legally] consent to sexual intercourse under any circumstances."
  3. Age Differential:  "The maximum difference in age between the victim and the defendant where an individual can legally consent to sexual intercourse - IF the victim is above the Minimum Age and below the Age of Consent."
  4. Minimum Age of Defendant:  "The age below which an individual cannot be prosecuted for engaging in sexual activities with minors."
  5. Report Source:  http://www.hhs.gov/opa/pubs/statutory-rape-state-laws.pdf
    or http://www.lewin.com/content/publications/3068.pdf
  6. AZ--Sexual Abuse definition:  "Sexual contact with someone less than 15 years of age if the sexual contact involves only the female breast where the defendant is not the victim’s spouse."
  7. AZ--Molestation of a Child definition:  "Sexual contact, except sexual contact with the female breast, with someone less than 15 years of age."
  8. AZ--Sexual Conduct with a Minor definition:  "a.) Sexual intercourse or oral sexual contact with someone less than 15 years of age where the defendant is not the victim’s spouse; b.) Sexual intercourse or oral sexual contact with someone at least 15 years of age and less than 18 years of age where the defendant is at least 19 years of age, not attending high school, at least 2 years older than the victim, and not the victim’s spouse."



Posted in: Education, Kids   Comments

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

Hanna Pre-Season Holiday Sale


For years, I have tried to get in the habit of shopping early for the holidays. You know, buying a little here and a little there, as great bargains are available. Then, come December, there's no pressure, no last minute panic and rushing around; just wrapping and sneaking packages under the tree.   [Continue Reading ...]

Hanna Andersson Pre-Season Sale

Not to mention, it is much easier (for me, anyway) to spread the cost out over several weeks. And I don't spend more than I should, because I'm not paying full price when I could have taken advantage of terrific sales - like this one at Hanna Andersson. With Sweaters and Dresses at $25.00 until October 24th, there is no doubt that shopping early and shopping often means I can actually get more (or do better) with my budget.

Hanna Andersson ~ Little Red Dress

I know that I would much rather be baking cookies and hanging ornaments in the week or so before Christmas, instead of chasing my tail, fighting the crowds, and hoping that I can still find the right item in the right size. In our case, we don't have a lot of local family. What we buy has to be shipped, meaning the earlier we get done, the greater our chances of helping everyone's Christmas run smoothly.

Hanna Andersson Organic Long Johns

Plus, seriously, how can you resist these adorable - organic cotton! - long johns? Unless you live in the Southwest, in just a few weeks, the weather is going to be getting colder and colder. Kids waiting for the bus in the morning will appreciate being warm and cozy.

Hanna Andersson ~ Long Johns

Years ago, I wore long johns or leg warmers under my longer skirts during the frosty Michigan winters. While running from the car to the office or cleaning the ice and snow off the car to go to work in the morning, I pulled the legs down to my shivering ankles. At the office, I tucked them back up and went about my business. Saved my skinny little legs on many days, I promise.

Wouldn't you love to see the kids (and grandkids) in these adorable Sweaters, Dresses, and cozy Long Johns? And, while you're at it, why not add a Banded Afghan in coordinating colors?




Thursday, September 23, 2010

Great Ways to Say Thanks


It's not intentional and it certainly isn't personal. I'm just horribly bad about sending thank-you cards / notes. Always have been. There may be hope, however.   [Continue Reading ...]

Imagine what new parents, or newlyweds, go through. Dozens (or more) gifts equals dozens (or more) thank-you notes. With everything else on their plate, now they have to sit down and scribble over and over on boring little cards. Yecch.

But ... put cute pictures of the baby - or great shots from the honeymoon trip - into a collage on the front of a thank-you card and voila! Now it's fun getting those notes out; sharing with friends and family. Even I wouldn't mind sending thank-you's like these.

If I could just find that pen ... and the stamps ... and my address book ...




Wednesday, September 22, 2010

Abbott Recalls Powdered Similac


The FDA announced today the voluntary recall of Similac powdered infant formula produced at a plant in Michigan. Apparently, the plant - and the product - have beetles.   [Continue Reading ...]

The notice from Abbott Labs downplays the risk and plays up the voluntary, pro-active perspective of the recall. Either way, bugs in baby formula is just not a good thing. Doesn't anyone follow standard sanitary manufacturing requirements anymore?

Apparently, ingesting beetles is not a huge health risk for infants; if the news release is to be trusted. But there is a chance that these babies could develop gastrointestinal issues, due to irritation of the GI tract by small insect parts. That is just the most disgusting thing I've read in a good long while.

And one more good reason to breastfeed, if at all possible.




Posted in: Business, Health, Kids, News   Comments

Friday, September 03, 2010

The Pen Does What?!

by

In what has to rank as the biggest did-you-check-before-you-gave-it-out in recent memory, German Kids Get 'Odd' Pens for first day at primary school. Told that the pens would light up when clicked, the German Communist Party decided kids would get a kick out of them. Well, someone's getting a kick - in the head!

I simply cannot believe that no one involved in putting together this handout stopped, if for no other reason than simple curiosity, to see if the pens worked. From that perspective alone - I try every lighter, flashlight, etc. that I buy before I bring it home - this whole mess could have easily been avoided.




Posted in: Education, Internet, Kids, News   Comments

Saturday, August 28, 2010

Every Day Scrubs

by

Over the years, we have spent a great deal of time at the hospital. (Luckily, not so much lately.) In that time, I have fallen in love with the scrubs that the nurses wear. They look cool and comfortable - just what I need.  . . . 

right arrow image   Read More  Every Day Scrubs

For lounging in front of the laptop. Or even a run to the store for soda and smokes. Seriously!

I see students from the local nursing program at the corner store all the time. If they can wear that medical scrub top (and comfy pants) out and about - so can I. In this incredible summer heat, scrubs have to be more comfortable than even my jean shorts.

Don't get me wrong, I'd never throw on a lab coat or try to create a "doctor uniform." Although, if you haven't checked out the styles lately, you might be surprised at just how non-medical many lab coats look. I actually could see myself throwing one, just a simple white jacket, over a tank top and jeans for a lunch date or trip to the grocery store.

What I didn't expect to find was scrubs for kids. These are seriously cute and incredibly practical. With their easy-on tops and elastic-waist pants, how great they must be for busy parents.

For adults or kids, I imagine part of the attraction - beyond comfort - is that they wash and dry like a dream. Who needs to stand over an ironing board for hours every week? I own an iron, but that doesn't mean I routinely buy clothes that will ever get to meet it.




Friday, August 13, 2010

Wow! It's Quiet in Here!

by

It's really strange. When Mark and I got together, it was just the two of us - for almost 3 years. We were good at just-the-two-of-us. Then, the children descended.  . . . 

right arrow image   Read More  Wow! It's Quiet in Here!

Eventually, we got really good at being just-the-four-of-us. Okay, maybe not really good - but, hey, nobody died and we're still together. But, starting in 2007, the kids started to disappear. First Frankie; then Michael. We were back to just-the-two-of-us and, although sad at first, we got good at it again.

Over the last 18 months or so, we've had one kid move in and out and in again. It really changes the dynamics - and floor space - when you add a third body (and personality) to the mix. He's been here for about 10 months now and we've adapted, as much as we're going to. Then, last night -- he left.

Granted, it's not a permanent move; he just went to spend the weekend with his older brother. But - Wow! It's quiet in here! And he's not even that noisy. If the room were bigger and you couldn't see him - constantly - out of the corner of your eye, you probably wouldn't even know he was here.

So how does the presence, or lack thereof, of one not-so-noisy person make the whole place seem different? I don't know, but I'll be glad when he gets home on Sunday. The silence is deafening!




Posted in: Home, Humor, Kids, Personal   Comments

Tuesday, July 06, 2010

Internet Access Is a Privilege Not A Right For Children

by

Guest post written by Alex Phillips  . . . 

right arrow image   Read  Internet Access Is a Privilege Not A Right For Children

Internet access is a privilege not a right for children, but with the new technology and free access to so much information it is also a good idea to have it right at hand. Since children are vulnerable to the whims of others it is also a good idea to make sure that you have control over what they are accessing via the satellite Internet West Virginia connection.

When we decided to install Wild Blue satellite Internet so that our daughter would be able to get the kind of information she needed for her school work we also installed some parental controls so that we would not have to worry so much about where she was going when browsing the net. With those controls we were also right there watching what she was doing by placing the computer in the family room where we could keep a close eye on her travels.

Prior to installing the Wild Blue wireless Internet to the computer we spent some time discussing what could happen while she was spending her time on the net. We cautioned her to be careful about what information she gave out about herself and where she lived. We also made sure that she knew she would give up her computer privileges if she disobeyed our instructions as to how she was allowed to use it. Over all it's been a good experience.




Monday, May 17, 2010

Pesticides and ADHD

by

For years, I tried to keep up with the latest news on ADHD. While information became more and more available, not much of it helped with an out-of-control teen-aged stepson. Now, we're looking at a correlation with pesticide exposure. More 'manufactured' science, like vaccines and autism? I'm not sure.  . . . 

right arrow image   Continue Reading  Pesticides and ADHD

ADHD and pesticides, to start with, is not a new research topic. Studies have been done before, frequently focusing on the children of migrant farm workers who have a higher pesticide exposure risk. Correlations have been made between pre- and post-natal exposure to organophosphates, lower scores on the Bayley MDI1, and higher incidence of PDD2 diagnoses.

However, as other articles point out, this is the first study to look at "the effects of exposure in the population at large." It is, to date, the largest study of its kind - measuring the levels of pesticide byproducts in the urine of 1,139 children, aged 8 to 15. But, this is where I start having a small problem.

The samples were collected during the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, conducted annually by the CDC on about 5,000 people in 15 counties across the United States. Only one sample was collected from these specific participants. One sample, upon which all subsequent conclusions were based, with no follow-up.

Briefly, the study found that children with higher levels of pesticide byproducts in their urine were more likely to be diagnosed with attention-deficit problems. It does not say that pesticide exposure causes ADDs. It also cannot, due to the lack of subsequent sampling, verify that the urine levels may fluctuate, may have been a one-time elevation, or that non-ADD-diagnosed children also experienced periodic higher levels.

Nonetheless, the connection does make sense to me. Organophosphates work by attacking the nervous system of pests. It is believed that they interfere with the function of acetylcholinesterase3, which controls acetylcholine4 levels and prevents excessive firing of neurons.

It can, therefore, be extrapolated that inhibited acetylcholinesterase / excess acetylecholine can be expected to negatively impact motor skills, learning, memory, and mood. Obviously, further extended studies are needed.



1 - The Bayley Mental Development Index (MDI) is one-third of The Bayley Scales of Infant Development and "evaluates several types of abilities: sensory/perceptual acuities, discriminations, and response; acquisition of object constancy; memory learning and problem solving; vocalization and beginning of verbal communication; basis of abstract thinking; habituation; mental mapping; complex language; and mathematical concept formation." The other two scales measure motor skills and behavior. Together they are used to identify children who may be at risk for developmental delay.

2 - NINDS (the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke) defines Pervasive Developmental Disorders (PDDs) as "a group of disorders characterized by delays in the development of socialization and communication skills." They include Autism, Asperger's Syndrome, and Rett's Syndrome.

3 - Acetylcholinesterase, according to MedicineNet.com, is "an enzyme that breaks down the neurotransmitter acetylcholine at the synaptic cleft (the space between two nerve cells) so the next nerve impulse can be transmitted across the synaptic gap. Pesticides of the organophosphate and carbamate types act ... by inhibiting ... acetylcholinesterase."

4 - Chemistry Encyclopedia explains that Acetylecholine is a neurotransmitter involved in "skeletal muscle movement ... the regulation of smooth muscle and cardiac muscle ... learning, memory, and mood." For nerve signals to transfer from neuron to neuron or muscle cell, acetylecholine must diffuse; higher levels in neuromuscular junctions inhibits signal movement.




Posted in: Education, Health, Kids, News   Comments

Monday, May 10, 2010

Do They Screen Employees?!

by

Looking for a 'hook' for an article about employment screening, I ran across something that, sadly, didn't surprise me too much. Teachers, child molesters, and union protection. Okay, the union thing wasn't part of my initial thoughts.  . . . 

right arrow image   Read More  Do They Screen Employees?!

We have, however, heard the stories. Usually they involve high-profile court cases, jail time, public humilitation, and a ban from contact with minors. Then, there are employees in New York schools.

One such teacher/molester, Francisco Olivares (Google it; the stories are all over), was employed in Queens. He married and impregnated (NOT in that order) a 16-year-old that he had (according to some reports) molested at age 13 while she was his student in math class. (Many weird math analogies come to mind, but I will spare my readers.)

Over the next 14 years, he is accused of molesting three other students. In two of the cases, he was charged and, due to a technicality, his conviction overturned. He's not alone; there are dozens of similar reports in New York schools.

What really riled me up was that - wait for it! - he's still on the payroll, kept away from students and earning in excess of $94,000 a year! As one report put it - Olivares, now 60, is being paid (handsomely, in my book) for NOT molesting students! And he's only one of over 600!

Attempts to get rid of him were, apparently, against state laws and - yup! - union rules. The department of education is settling for having him (and his 600+ 'friends') away from students. Hmmmm!?

I don't molest minors, which may immediately disqualify me. But - for $94,000 a year - I could be persuaded to continue my, abnormal by NY schools' standards, non-molesting behavior.




Posted in: Education, Internet, Kids, News   Comments

Monday, May 03, 2010

Shaken Babies and the Recession

by

We have heard about families losing their homes, businesses going under for lack of financing, and yet the worst has (apparently) just surfaced: Shaken-Baby Cases Rose During the Recession. Not surprisingly, there are two schools of thought on this situation. It's just difficult to find the other one.  . . . 

right arrow image   Read More  Shaken Babies and the Recession

The study, being given some exposure in the press, claims that parents, stressed out by their economic situation, are shaking the life out of their infants. "A team of researchers led by child-abuse expert Dr. Rachel Berger at Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh reported a significant increase in cases of shaken-baby syndrome." according to Alice Park's article.

Is this an increase in SBS, or an increase in reporting? Are more parents losing their cool or are more CPS teams misdiagnosing the situation? The articles in the press seem to say parents are shaking their infants to death, out of stress.

The other school of thought is that CPS departments around the country, to whom questionable injuries are reported, are designating accidents as SBS, in order to justify their existence and continue their funding. Sites like kidjacked.com and fightcps.com claim that CPS departments are out of control. The truth probably falls somewhere in between - doesn't it always. Yet,

There is a story of a toddler who fell and hit her head on a table. Her mother took her to emergency and was reported to CPS. It took 2 years to have the case dismissed, according to the story, yet the parents were branded child-abusers and never got their kids back. Is this a true story, or one of those urban legend offerings, designed to fire up (my apologies) any idiot who'll jump on the band wagon?

It doesn't really matter what stories are true and what stories are fabricated. If nonsense is given front-page status, the wrong people will respond. And serious threats to our children will be buried in false truths.




Posted in: Education, Health, Kids, Media, News   Comments

Monday, March 29, 2010

Baby Showers

by

I was wondering (for a variety of reasons) just what baby showers are like these days. Thank Heaven! maternity clothes finally changed. And baby shower invitations are much broader in scope and style than they were in my day. But what exactly does one do at a baby shower, these days?  . . . 

right arrow image   Read More  Baby Showers

Since I barely recall having or attending a baby shower, I was amused to find that there are still silly games and favors. Most seemed like fun. Some suggestions were more practical than others: creating scrapbook pages or redeemable coupons sounded like great activities. The creativity behind some of the ideas for couples showers that I ran across was actually inspiring.

Do most people still hold the shower before the baby's birth? or are they waiting? Waiting always made more sense to me. That way the baby doesn't spend the first six months of his/her life dressed in the somewhat limited range of non-gender-specific items on the market.

Although, frankly, the baby doesn't care. And Mom and Dad are going to be too bleary-eyed from lack of sleep to even notice what color sleeper they just pulled out of the dresser. So, maybe before-or-after isn't that important, after all.




Friday, March 19, 2010

It's Not Good to Be a Sick Kid in Arizona

by

It is not a good time to be a poor, sick kid in Arizona. Although, even the poor, healthy kids are losing out.

Arizona Governor Jan Brewer annouced that, due to financial difficulties in the state, the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) will be cancelled. Effective June 15th, the state, according to Brewer, can no longer afford to pay its share of the expenses for this program. A program covering 39,000 children in families between 100% and 200% of federal poverty level income.

There is a, possible, light at the end of the tunnel: A provision in the healthcare reform bill before Congress includes a "maintenance of effort" provision that may require the state to keep its SCHIP program in place. We'll see.

In the meantime, if you live in Arizona and need emergent care - expect a long wait at the local emergency room, which may become the only option for a lot of families.




Posted in: Financial, Health, Kids, News   Comments


Images of JMark Afghans' Products

JMark Afghans Slideshow - Get Yours at Kizoa